Sarah Newman’s practice focuses on appellate litigation as well as motions practice and issue analysis at the trial level. She represents both plaintiffs and defendants in the United States Supreme Court, the federal courts of appeals, federal district courts, and state courts. Ms. Newman’s practice covers a wide variety of substantive areas, including constitutional law, intellectual property, securities fraud, criminal law, enforcement of arbitral awards, and business litigation.
Before joining MoloLamken, Ms. Newman served as a law clerk to Judge Stephen Higginson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and to Judge Edmond Chang of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
- Foreign central bank in a separation of powers challenge to a statute directing the outcome of a specific pending case (Bank Markazi v. Peterson, 136 S. Ct. 1310 (2016))
- Plaintiff class in a petition for certiorari to the United States Supreme Court in a suit arising under the Price-Anderson Act and Colorado nuisance law (Cook v. Dow Chemical Co., Nos. 15-791, 15-911)
- Obtained vacatur of a default judgment imposed as a discovery sanction on a drone manufacturer in a patent infringement lawsuit (Drone Techs., Inc. v. Parrot S.A., 838 F.3d 1283 (Fed. Cir. 2016))
- Lead plaintiffs on appeal in a securities class action against Alibaba Group (Christine Asia Co. v. Ma, No. 16-2519 (2d Cir.))
- Obtained enforcement of an ICSID arbitral award against the Kyrgyz Republic for a Turkish construction company (Sistem Mühendislik Inşaat Sanayi Ve Ticaret, A.Ş. v. Kyrgyz Republic, No. 12 Civ. 4502, 2016 WL 5793399 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2016))
- Obtained summary judgment on behalf of a national moving company defeating claims in two putative class actions under the Motor Carrier Act (Mervyn v. Nelson Westerberg, Inc., No. 11 C 6594, 2016 WL 1270416 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 31, 2016), and Mervyn v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc., No. 13 C 3587, 2017 WL 1437159 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 20, 2017))
- Global financial institution in multiple RMBS “putback” suits in the Southern District of New York and New York Supreme Court